犀ヶ崖古戦場

3.7/5 に基づく 8 レビュー

Contact 犀ヶ崖古戦場

住所 :

25, Shikatanicho, Naka Ward, Hamamatsu, 〒432-8014 Shizuoka,Japan

Webサイト : http://www.hamamatsu-books.jp/category/detail/4dd1cbeeb0051.html
カテゴリ:
街 : Shizuoka

25, Shikatanicho, Naka Ward, Hamamatsu, 〒432-8014 Shizuoka,Japan
伊藤浩之 on Google

浜松 観光スポット お勧めのポイントです。まず無料! 駐車場も完備。 三方原の合戦の際に徳川軍がこの崖に長い布を張り橋のように見せて、追ってきた武田軍をこの崖下に落としたと言われています。そうした事からこの辺りは布橋と呼ばれています(ただこれは全くの伝説で実話ではないようですが…)。 遠州の有名な奇祭「遠州大念仏」は、こうした霊達を鎮めるために始まったものです。 運が良ければこの近くに住んでいるリスが時々見られます?
Hamamatsu tourist spot is a recommended point. First free! There is also a parking lot. It is said that during the battle of Mikatahara, the Tokugawa army displayed a long cloth on this cliff like a bridge, and dropped the Takeda army that had been chasing under it. For that reason, this area is called Nunobashi (although this is a true legend and not a true story...). The famous strange festival of Enshu, "Enshu Daienbutsu," was started to calm these spirits. If you're lucky, you can sometimes see squirrels living near here ?
c
chups 75 on Google

三方ケ原の戦いにおいて武田軍が犀ヶ崖まで進攻してきた際、地理不案内な武田軍は足を踏み外し、崖の下に転落するものが続出した。 犀ヶ崖は家康軍が崖に布の橋を掛け、武田軍の目をあざむき、次々と崖に転げ落ち大損害をこうむったという伝説を作り上げたほどの深く大きな谷間であった。現在の「布橋」という地名もこの伝説からつけられている。 現在はかなり埋め立てられ、当時の地形とは変わってしまっているが、当時は東西約2km、幅約50m、両岸は絶壁でその深さは約40mに及んでいたと伝えられる。 布橋一丁目の国道257号線沿いに「三方原古戦場犀ヶ崖」と刻まれた史跡碑があり、犀が崖資料館もある。 1952(昭和27)年4月1日に静岡県の文化財に指定された。
During the Battle of Mikatagahara, when the Takeda Army advanced to Saiga Cliff, the geographically uninformed Takeda Army stepped out and many of them fell under the cliff. Saiga Cliff was a deep and large valley where the Ieyasu army made a cloth bridge over the cliff, gazed at Takeda's army, and fell to the cliffs one after another, causing great damage. The legendary name of the place now called "Nunobashi" is also given. It is said to have been completely reclaimed at present, and has changed from the topography at that time, but at that time it was said that it was about 2 km east-west, about 50 m wide, cliffs on both banks and the depth was about 40 m. Along the National Route 257 in Nunobashi 1-chome, there is a historical monument engraved as "Mikatahara Ancient Battlefield Saiga Cliff", and there is also the Sai Cliff Museum. It was designated as a cultural property of Shizuoka Prefecture on April 1, 1952.
市川美貴子 on Google

資料館の方から分りやすく説明がありとても良かったです。白い布を掛けて布橋を作ったとゆう話は後で創作されたお話だそうですが、崖の底に馬もろとも武田軍の武士が堕ちたとゆうのは本当だそうです。そして亡霊たちのうめき声が夜な夜な聞こえたそうで、供養にと愛知県からお坊さんを呼んで弔ったとの事でした。
It was very good that the museum explained it in an easy-to-understand manner. It is said that the story of making Nunohashi by hanging white cloth is a story that was created later, but it is true that the samurai of the Takeda army fell to the bottom of the cliff. He heard the moans of the ghosts at night, and he called a monk from Aichi prefecture to mourn for a memorial service.
はるのゆいたろう on Google

「犀ヶ崖古戦場」は三方ヶ原の戦いで勝利した武田軍が、敗走する徳川軍を追撃してきた際に、ここの崖地形を活かして徳川軍が反撃の奇襲を行い、コレ以上の追走を許さなかったと伝わる場所です。 今は市街地となり、崖地形が確認できる場所は史跡の周辺のわずかだけになっています。とは言え今でも分かる急峻な地形は伏兵にはうってつけで地の利がない武田軍を追い払うには良かったんだと思います。 しかしここから浜松城は目と鼻の先になるので、万が一に犀ヶ崖で一矢を報いなければ城は落城していたかもしれません。そうなると歴史が大きく変わり太平の江戸時代は来なかったかもしれないと歴史の転換となった古戦場なのだと思いました。
In the "Saiga Cliff Ancient Battlefield", when the Takeda army, which won the battle of Mikatagahara, pursued the routing Tokugawa army, the Tokugawa army made a surprise attack by taking advantage of the cliff terrain here, and chased more than this. It is a place where you can tell that you did not allow the run. It is now an urban area, and there are only a few places where you can see the cliff topography around the historic site. However, the steep terrain that can still be seen is perfect for ambush soldiers, and I think it was good to get rid of the Takeda army, which has no advantage. However, since Hamamatsu Castle is just a stone's throw away from here, the castle may have fallen if you didn't reward it at Saigagake. In that case, history changed drastically, and I thought that it was an ancient battlefield that changed history, thinking that the Edo period of Taihei might not have come.
杉山裕子 on Google

武田信玄軍と若き日の徳川家康軍が対峙し多くの兵士が深い崖から落ち命を落とした。それらの霊を慰めるため遠州大念仏が行われるようになった。崖を覗き込むと武将達の怨念に引きずり込まれるような錯覚を覚える。
Shingen Takeda and young Ieyasu Tokugawa faced each other, and many soldiers died from deep cliffs. Enshu Daibutsu Buddha has been held to comfort those spirits. If you look into the cliff, you will feel the illusion of being drawn into the warriors' dreams.
森昭二 on Google

三方ヶ原の戦いに惨敗した徳川勢が武田軍に奇襲をかけて大きな損害を与えたという古戦場の跡です。 こんなことを言うと怒られそうですが、私はこれは三方ヶ原の敗戦を少しでもカモフラージュするための作り話ではないかと思いますが。つまり徳川軍は三方ヶ原では武田軍に大敗したが、ここでは一矢報いたんだというように・・・皆さんはどう思いますか? それにしても犀ヶ崖は深いですね。私は高所恐怖症ではありませんが、崖下を見下ろすと目が眩みそうです。でも昔は今よりももっと深かったそうです。資料館の方に犀ヶ崖の昔の貴重な写真も見せていただきました。いずれにせよ、都市部でこのような大きな崖を見れる場所は少ないと思います。そういう意味でも貴重な場所ですね。 古戦場の石碑のすぐ近くに大島蓼太の句碑があります。 岩角に 兜くだけて 椿かな
It is a trace of an old battlefield where the Tokugawa clan, who lost the battle of Mikatagahara, ambushed the Takeda army and caused great damage. You might get angry when you say this, but I think this is a myth to camouflage the defeat of Mikatagahara as much as possible. In other words, the Tokugawa army was defeated by the Takeda army in Mikatagahara, but here it was a reward ... What do you think? Even so, Saigagake is deep. I'm not afraid of heights, but looking down on the cliffs makes me dazzle. But in the old days it was deeper than it is now. The museum also showed me a valuable old photograph of Saigagake. In any case, I don't think there are many places in the city where you can see such a big cliff. In that sense, it's a valuable place. There is a monument of Ryota Oshima in the immediate vicinity of the stone monument on the ancient battlefield. Is it a camellia just by wearing a helmet on the rock corner?
岩渕とうり on Google

平日に行けば、ガイドさんが案内していて、色々と詳しく説明してくれますよ~? ?月曜日は、休日なので誰も居ません❗ 奥に駐車?️?スペースもありますよ~?
If you go on weekdays, the guide will guide you and explain in detail in various ways ~ ? ? Monday is a holiday so no one is there ❗ There is also a parking space in the back ?️? ~ ?
濱乃翔穏 on Google

三方ヶ原の合戦の一部と見なされる古戦場です。かつては幅50m、深さ40m、長さ2kmもの規模があったとされる犀ヶ崖も、長年の間に崩れたり埋められたりして、今では幅30m、深さ13m、長さ400mほどと小さくなりました。昭和11年の埋め立てにより、西端は国道257号線で途切れていますが、合戦当時はもっと西まで延びていたものと想像しています。 「仮に犀ヶ崖が存在せず、浜松城周辺の地形がもっと開けていたなら、武田軍は多くの兵を崖から転落させることもなく、大軍で浜松城に攻め入ることもできたのでは?」と私は考えました。もし3万前後の武田本隊が総力戦を仕掛けていたら、まだ小規模だった浜松城は攻略され、三方ヶ原から城内に逃げ帰っていた家康は、討ち取られたか降伏していたことでしょう。 その結果、浜松は武田氏の配下となり、諏訪原城や高天神城の戦いは起こらず、長篠の戦いは状況が変わり、関ヶ原の戦いすら生じなかったかもしれません。当然の帰結として、徳川幕府による江戸時代も無く、今日に至る450年の歴史は全く違うものになっていたはずです。そのような理由により「犀ヶ崖および浜松城周辺の地形が、日本の歴史に大きな影響を与えた」と私は考えています。天然の要害とも言える地形を巧みに利用した、家康の築城センスは見事というほかありません。 武田軍が野営していた場所は北高校東側一帯と推測しますが、当時は数本の谷が入り組んだ台地でした。そのような場所で闇夜に鉄砲隊が脅しをかければ、戦で疲労した末に寝込みを襲われ、地理も不案内な武田軍は混乱し、次々と谷底に転落していったことでしょう。その死傷者数については文献により大きな幅があるのですが、実際には数十名程度であったと推測します。 ちなみに白い布を雪が積もった橋に見せかけたという逸話に関しては、確かな文献もなく技術的にもあり得ないため、「小豆餅と銭取」の類いの、浜松市によくある家康伝説のひとつに過ぎないものだと思っています。 この後の十数日間、武田軍はわずか12km先の刑部(おさかべ)村で停滞し、越年をしています。その間、家康はさぞ眠れない日々を過ごしていたことでしょうが、浜松城は攻撃を受けませんでした。信玄の病状が相当悪化していたためか、信長の援軍が駆けつける恐れがあったためか、信玄と息子の勝頼は31歳の家康の将来性を軽視して、浜松城より三河の野田城攻略を優先させました。 何れにしても、浜松で家康を見逃したことが、天目山にて勝頼が信長・家康連合軍に滅ぼされるという結末を招く、痛恨の要因となりました。ちなみに、この2ヶ月半ほど前の「一言坂の合戦」でも、信玄に見逃される形で家康は命拾いをしています。 歴史的には「三方ヶ原の合戦は家康の大敗北だった」とされていますが、「空城の計」を用い、普済寺に火を放ち、犀ヶ崖の夜襲で一矢報いて武田軍を退却させたことが事実とすれば、実質的には「7対3程度の負け戦」であったと私は見ています。幾多の戦を生き延びて75歳の長寿を全うした家康は、実力のみならず運にも恵まれた男だったのです。 三方ヶ原の合戦は日本史の教科書に登場することも少なく、軽く扱われてきました。しかし「この合戦で家康が九死に一生を得て生き延びたことで徳川幕府が実現した」という事実から、もっと重要視されてもよいのではないかと思います。
It is an old battlefield that is considered part of the Battle of Mikatagahara. Saigagake, which used to be 50m wide, 40m deep and 2km long, has collapsed and buried over the years and is now 30m wide, 13m deep and 400m long. It has become smaller. Due to the reclamation in 1945, the western end was interrupted by National Highway 257, but I imagine that it extended further to the west at the time of the battle. "If Saigagake did not exist and the terrain around Hamamatsu Castle was more open, the Takeda army could have attacked Hamamatsu Castle with a large army without letting many soldiers fall off the cliff. I thought. If around 30,000 Takeda main corps had set up a total war, Hamamatsu Castle, which was still small, would have been captured, and Ieyasu, who had fled from Mikatagahara to the castle, would have been defeated or surrendered. As a result, Hamamatsu became a subordinate of Mr. Takeda, and the battles of Suwahara Castle and Takatenjin Castle did not occur, the situation of Nagashino's battle changed, and even the battle of Sekigahara may not have occurred. As a corollary, there must have been a completely different history of 450 years to this day without the Edo period by the Tokugawa Shogunate. For that reason, I think that the topography around Saigagake and Hamamatsu Castle had a great influence on the history of Japan. Ieyasu's sense of fortification, which skillfully utilizes the terrain that can be said to be a natural hazard, is nothing short of spectacular. I presume that the Takeda army was camping in the eastern part of Kita High School, but at that time it was a plateau with several valleys. If the gun corps threatened in such a place at night, the Takeda army, whose geography was unfamiliar, would have fallen to the bottom of the valley one after another. The number of casualties varies widely depending on the literature, but it is estimated that the number was actually several tens. By the way, regarding the anecdote that a white cloth was disguised as a bridge covered with snow, there is no reliable literature and it is technically impossible, so it is one of the legends of Ieyasu that is common in Hamamatsu City, like "Azukimochi and Zenitori". I think it's just something. For the next ten or so days, the Takeda army has stagnated in the village of Osakabe, just 12 km away, and has passed the year. During that time, Ieyasu would have had a sleepless day, but Hamamatsu Castle was not attacked. Maybe because Shingen's condition had deteriorated considerably, or because Nobunaga's reinforcements might have rushed in, Shingen and his son Katsuyori disregarded the future of 31-year-old Ieyasu and prioritized the capture of Mikawa's Noda Castle over Hamamatsu Castle. I did. In any case, the oversight of Ieyasu in Hamamatsu was a cause of grief, leading to the destruction of Katsuyori by the Nobunaga-Ieyasu Allied Forces on Mt. Tenmoku. By the way, even in the "Battle of Hitokotozaka" about two and a half months ago, Ieyasu was killed by Shingen. Historically, it is said that the battle of Mikatagahara was a great defeat of Ieyasu, but using the "Empty Fort Strategy", he set fire to Puji Temple and rewarded the Takeda army with a night attack on the Saiga cliff. If the fact that I retreated was a fact, I think that it was actually a "losing battle of about 7 to 3". Ieyasu, who survived many battles and lived a long life of 75 years old, was a man who was blessed with not only ability but also luck. The Battle of Mikatagahara rarely appears in Japanese history textbooks and has been treated lightly. However, from the fact that "Ieyasu survived in this battle with a lifetime of nine deaths, the Tokugawa Shogunate was realized", I think it may be more important.

Write some of your reviews for the company 犀ヶ崖古戦場

あなたのレビューは、情報を見つけて評価する際に他の顧客に非常に役立ちます

評価 *
あなたのレビュー *

(Minimum 30 characters)

あなたの名前 *