Clinical Research Tokyo Hospital - Shinjuku City

Name: Clinical Research Tokyo Hospital - Shinjuku City
Address: ＩＣＲ附属クリニカルリサーチ東京病院 ３F 3 Chome-87-4 Haramachi, Shinjuku City, Tokyo 162-0053, Japan, 162-0053, Japan

2/5 ★ に基づく 8 レビュー

Contact Clinical Research Tokyo Hospital

住所：	ＩＣＲ附属クリニカルリサーチ東京病院３F 3 Chome-87-4 Haramachi, Shinjuku City, Tokyo 162-0053, Japan
電話：	📞 +87
Postal code :	162-0053
Webサイト：	http://www.crht.jp/
カテゴリ：	General hospital , Hospital ,

ＩＣＲ附属クリニカルリサーチ東京病院３F 3 Chome-87-4 Haramachi, Shinjuku City, Tokyo 162-0053, Japan

Best General hospital in japan

た	たろあろ on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 事前検診後に、梅毒の陽性反応がでたと連絡があり、クリニックと保健所にて再検査をしました。しかしどちらも陰性で、苦情の電話を入れましたが、こちらは間違ってないの一点張り。検査結果を聞くまで、心配で眠れない日々が続いていましたので、謝罪の一言でもあればまだ良かったのですが....。検診中も、全てが形式的で、まるで物を扱うような感じでした。余談ですが、参加予定だった治験は、1か月入院で85万の報奨金でした！女性限定ですが、コロナの為か倍率は4~5倍？でした。今後治験の予定はないですが、参考程度に書かせて頂きました~。 After the pre-examination, I was informed that I had a positive reaction for syphilis, so I re-examined at the clinic and health center. However, both were negative and I made a complaint call, but this is not wrong. Until I heard the test results, I couldn't sleep because I was worried, so I wish I had a word of apology. Even during the examination, everything was formal and I felt like I was handling things. As an aside, the clinical trial I was planning to participate in was a one-month hospitalization with a reward of 850,000! Only for women, but maybe because of corona, the magnification is 4 to 5 times? was. There are no plans for clinical trials in the future, but I wrote it for reference only.
7	71度 on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 初回だと入って良いか不安と思うので入口の写真。 2回、スクリーニングのみ。口コミで不安になった分、現場は普通に感じた。採血でごめんなさい、もう一回とやられてる人がいて口コミのままだが、若い人で単に歴が浅いだけなのかと思った。別日すごく気を遣ってくれた若い男性スタッフもいた。事前事項に運動禁止を書かずに「検査前の運動しちゃうと駄目かも」と当日に廊下問診で言うのはやめてほしい。数値判断で人選頂くのは当然だが、不参加判定だと一度採血すれば2週～12週空けなければ次に応募できない検査もあり、行くこと自体無駄になるので禁止事項は明らかにしてほしい。良いと思ったのは資料が噛み砕いてあり見やすい。事前に大体の献立を教えてくれること。の２つ。注意なのは検査だけでも協力費は振込が次月25日前後で最長55日待つ。 I'm worried if it's okay to enter for the first time, so a photo of the entrance. Twice, screening only. The site felt normal because I was worried about the word of mouth. I'm sorry for the blood sampling, there is a person who has been done again and it is still a word of mouth, but I thought that it was just a young person with a short history. There was also a young male staff member who took great care of me the other day. I would like you to stop saying "It may be useless if you exercise before the examination" in the corridor interview on the day without writing the prohibition of exercise in the prior items. It is natural that people are selected by numerical judgment, but if it is a non-participation judgment, once blood is collected, there are tests that can not be applied next until 2 to 12 weeks have passed, so it is useless to go, so please clarify the prohibited items. What I thought was good was that the materials were chewed and easy to see. Tell me about the menu in advance. Two of. It is important to note that the cooperation fee will be transferred around the 25th of the following month for a maximum of 55 days.
T	Tom Elf 15 Cat on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 他の方のレビューにもあるように、とかくスタッフの手際が悪いと感じました。私が受けたスクリーニング検査では、ペンが必要なのに回収してしまったり、人数分のテーブルを準備できなかったり、参加者が多すぎて簡単なスクリーニングに２時間以上かかったり、他の施設や献血ルームではありえないほど採血に手間取る看護師に当たったり、早い時間に来た人とは異なり受付ブースではなく卓上に並べて置かれただけの身分証を返却されたりして、非常に困惑しました。このような病院で治験を受けるのはとても不安になったので、スクリーニング検査で不適になって、むしろ良かったと思うほどです。 As in the reviews of other people, I felt that the staff was not very good at it. In the screening test I received, I needed a pen but collected it, I could not prepare a table for the number of people, there were too many participants and it took more than 2 hours for a simple screening, other facilities and blood donation rooms I was very confused because I was hit by a nurse who took a lot of time to collect blood, and unlike those who came early, I was returned an ID card that was just placed side by side on the table instead of the reception booth. I was so worried about taking a clinical trial at a hospital like this, so I wasn't happy with the screening test.
m	mya-a ver on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 半日治験しました。特段不快な思いもなく終了。アットホームな感じで普通の病院のイメージとは違いました。半日×2回体験、どちらも注射のみだかやはり特に不快な事はなし。ラーメンの人の注射でびっくりしたが、無事終了。その後、採血も行なったがすべて普通。泊まりは未体験。 I had a half-day clinical trial. Finished without any unpleasant feelings. It felt at home and was different from the image of a normal hospital. Half a day x 2 experiences, both of which are only injections, there is nothing particularly unpleasant. I was surprised at the injection of a ramen person, but it ended safely. After that, blood was collected, but everything was normal. I have never stayed.
m	mottyo ishiguro on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ こちらで治験の事前検診の健康診断を受けたところ健康診断結果は有料で希望の方のみお伝えすると言ったにも関わらず何故か受けた当日の夜に診断結果の電話が掛かってきて梅毒の陽性だと申告を受けました。こちらは全く見に覚えがなく不安になり別の病院で精密検査を受けたらRPR,TP抗体と共に陰性と診断されました。おかげで無駄に診察料検査代を払う羽目になりましたまともに検査しているかすら怪しくそもそも説明会で受けた話と矛盾しています私は以上の出来事を持って直談判をして弁護士に相談するか検討中です Where I received a health checkup for a clinical trial Health check results will be given only to those who wish for a fee Despite saying that For some reason, the diagnosis result was called on the night of the day I received it. I was declared positive for syphilis. I don't remember seeing this at all, and when I got anxious and had a detailed examination at another hospital, I got RPR and TP antibodies. I was diagnosed as negative. thanks to I ended up paying the examination fee in vain. I'm suspicious even if I'm inspecting properly It is inconsistent with the story I received at the briefing session in the first place. I have the above events and make a direct interview I am considering whether to consult a lawyer
U	U.T on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 複数回、最終日まで参加済の意見です。守秘義務の範囲内での投稿ですが。平均評価が低めなのは、治験病院ではよく目にするゆえ、気にする必要はないと思います。低評価を下されるのは、スクリーニング落ちした人達の偏った意見ゆえかなと推測します。もちろん、他の病院と同じく、スクリーニング検査を通るのは想像以上に少数なので、他の病院で通過しない場合はここでも同様で、自分が健康体でない自覚があるなら、治験バイトは早々に諦めるべきです。ここの病院では、入院してもさらに5割程(?)がスクリーニングにかけられ、泊まるつもりで荷物を準備してきても、帰宅させられることになる(これは被験者全員に入院前から可能性を予告されている)ので、事前スクリーニングで落とされるよりも無念さが増すと思います。この点は特に注意が必要だと思います。しかし、幸いにも毎回入院最終日まで残れる者としては、低評価レビューで書かれているような進行、採血、態度、設備等についての不満は特に感じませんでした。むしろ、複数回目の参加時点で気づける程に改善されている点もいくつかあり、被験者に対する意欲と配慮を感じました。また、このレビューを意識しているのかわかりませんが、低評価に繋がるようなサービスを減らそうと努力しているようにも感じました。看護師さんたちは皆丁寧に説明、作業をしてくれたので、個人的には満足です。また来ても良いと感じました。実質的な★は3つか4つですが、何度かお世話になっているので、お気持ち表明として★5つにします。 It is an opinion that I have participated multiple times until the last day. This is a post within the scope of confidentiality. I don't think you need to worry about the low average rating, as you often see it in clinical trial hospitals. I presume that the low rating is due to the biased opinions of those who failed the screening. Of course, as with other hospitals, the number of people who pass screening tests is smaller than expected, so if you do not pass at other hospitals, the same is true here. am. At this hospital, about 50% (?) Will be screened even if you are hospitalized, and even if you prepare your luggage with the intention of staying, you will be sent home (this is a warning to all the subjects before admission). I think it will be more regrettable than being dropped by pre-screening. I think this point needs special attention. Fortunately, however, I didn't feel any dissatisfaction with the progress, blood sampling, attitude, equipment, etc. as described in the low-rated reviews as those who remained until the final day of hospitalization each time. Rather, there were some points that were noticeably improved at the time of multiple participation, and I felt motivation and consideration for the subjects. Also, I don't know if I'm aware of this review, but I feel like I'm trying to reduce the number of services that lead to low ratings. All the nurses explained and worked carefully, so I'm personally satisfied. I felt it was okay to come again. The actual number of ★ is 3 or 4, but since I have been indebted several times, I will use 5 as an expression of my feelings.
T	T T on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 治験で参加しました。他の方が詳しく書かれているので、他施設と比べてのこと簡単に箇条書きします。良い点・施設がきれい・採血は特に問題ありませんでした・参加者に対しての気遣いが素晴らしい良くない点・ご飯がカロリーに対して若干少なく感じる・デイルームなどベッド以外で過ごせるところが少ないスタッフの方が作業効率を求めていくと、参加者が制約を受けていくというバランスが難しいと思いますが、かなり絶妙なラインでやって頂いていると感じました。 I participated in a clinical trial. Others have written in detail, so it's easier to itemize compared to other facilities. good point ・ The facility is clean ・ There was no particular problem with blood sampling. ・ Great consideration for participants Bad points ・ I feel that the rice is slightly less than the calories ・ There are few places such as day rooms where you can spend time outside the bed. I think it is difficult for the staff to balance the fact that the participants are restricted when they seek work efficiency, but I feel that they are doing it on a fairly exquisite line.
k	koichi tachi on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 一般病院ではなく治験専門病院袋小路の途中にあり看板も無い為とても分かりにくい。建物自体にも表記は無くエレベーター前の表示で初めてわかる。一般病院ではないので積極的に誘導する必要が無いからであろう。HPで検索すると通常「経路案内」や「アクセス」と出るのだが「交通指南　Direction guidance in Chinese」と出て来る。クリックするとPDFで中国語の案内が出現する。日本人向けの施設ではないのかもしれない。 Clinical trial hospital, not a general hospital It is very difficult to understand because it is in the middle of the dead end and there is no signboard. There is no notation on the building itself, and you can see it for the first time by the display in front of the elevator. This is probably because it is not a general hospital, so there is no need to actively guide it. When I search on the website, I usually get "Route guidance" and "Access", but I get "Direction guidance in Chinese". Click to display a PDF guide in Chinese. It may not be a facility for Japanese people.