㈱アジャイルシステム開発

How you feel depends on your personal values, but I will describe my actual experience. I was insulted, which could be my lifelong trauma. I hope it will serve as a criterion for sensible people. I am currently working as a full-time employee at another IT company. Female in her 30s, unmarried, no children. The people at this company I worked with were excellent and they were all very nice people. I was invited by this company to join the company a few months later. I have met with several executives, and I am glad that everyone has a wonderful personality and that they have evaluated me as "I want to work together", and I am very grateful to be able to work together in the future. Was there. I was asked to have an interview with my superior before GW, and I have had an interview this time. Below are the interviewer's attitudes and remarks at that time. There are two interviewers. I hardly saw him in the form of talking with two people almost in sync, and talked with the introducer sitting next to me. ・ Poor Yusuri from the side where you sat down. Then continue until the end. ・ Do not start an interview by pointing out mistakes in the materials prepared by the person who introduced you. ・ A series of Matahara remarks Example: "Do you have children?" "Since there are many female employees in our company, it would be a problem if we could take maternity leave all at once, so we do not want to increase the number of women." ・ "It is a contradiction not to qualify for GOLD while saying that you want to master the Java language." ・ "Age up to 27" and then "Up to 30" ・ Since I changed jobs a lot, I repeatedly said, "I'm worried about the reason for retirement," so I can understand this very well, so I "explain the reason for retirement." → Interviewer "I don't need it." Please explain only one company. ・ Looking at my work history, I repeat "I can't trust you." But I wasn't given the opportunity to explain. First of all, it starts with denial, unilaterally insults, and repeats personality denial. ・ Guided cross-examination, not interview. If I give a reply I don't like, either ignore it or complain to the referrer. ・ There are three points to repeat: work history, woman, and age. All of the contents can be confirmed in the resume and resume submitted more than a week ago, and it is enough to decline in advance. What was the time, effort, and foot (other than the interviewer working at the head office) used by me, an introducer, two interviewers, and one executive (two from the middle) in attendance? Is it? ・ After repeating denial of personality, he finally smiled at me, saying, "Regular employees are not good, but if they are non-regular, you can consider it." I ran a spit. I was aware that an interview is a place to confirm things that cannot be understood in writing, but this time I was taught a new form of interview. There are also inhumane interviews where you repeatedly deny the contents of the document, occasionally ask questions on the premise of degrading, and simply repeat the denial of personality using power. Thank you for studying. I have written all the facts, but in case there is a mistake in my memory, please feel free to contact me if you have any mistakes. I will fix it. At the end. I would like to thank the introducer who was present and explained to me from beginning to end. I am not a person who can use power to deny personality to someone I do not know for the first time. We sincerely hope that all of your employees living in Reiwa will continue to play an active role in the future.