CPA会計学院 水道橋校

Worst phone call

It's important and really easy to study. If you want to become a CPA from now on, CPA would be good.

Too many typographical errors. The text is very easy to understand and the teachers are eager and motivated. I can understand that the passing rate is high. However, there are too many corrections (typographical errors) in texts, problem collections, and all other distributions. It is a member of us, and it takes a lot of time and effort to make corrections on our own against the correction table. You can see it once. Please do your best to avoid typographical errors as much as possible. I support you

Textbooks and instructors are normal, but tutors and receptionists are not very responsive. Especially the harshness of the tutor stands out. It doesn't tell me if I don't bow my head, and the level of knowledge of the tutor is low in the first place, and all the responses are as written in the text. I don't have any compassion, and I'm wondering if I don't understand this, so I'm discouraged from asking questions. I don't want to doubt the enthusiasm of the instructors, but if this situation lasts too long, I'll write a name for this review. (As of January 28, 2022)

Those who have passed a short answer in 10 months and are waiting for the result of the treatise, but have passed in 13 months. I will leave a review of the impressions I studied here. First of all, regarding teachers and teaching materials, I think this is good overall. Especially, it is helpful to advise the importance of the issue in the textbook and class. When studying another qualification at another prep school in the past, a method that induces inefficient study that you can not get a high score unless you hit the sumi of the heavy box by giving a less important part as an answer I was wondering, but cpa gives out minor issues in the answer, but in class it says "Ignore even if you get out in the answer and concede a goal", so cut it comfortably and efficiently I was able to study. The degree of freedom regarding instructors and attendance schedules is also very high. By subject, financial accounting and management accounting are very good because they emphasize reasoning. However, there were too many typographical errors in management accounting in my year. Also, I was worried that there were some places where there was no reason or insufficient reason for saying "Understanding is important!" In the promotion of the prep school. The Corporate Law (Company Law) is difficult to understand for both instructors and teaching materials. At first, I thought that the Companies Act itself was difficult, but after reading a book for the bar examination students, the Companies Act changed to my strongest subject. Looking at twitter, it seems that there are a certain number of people who are using it together with lec, and I think that the satisfaction level is not very high overall. However, the situation may have changed recently because a lawyer instructor has been added. The audit theory itself is difficult to understand in the first place, so the teaching materials are not easy to understand, but the lectures were good because of the analysis advice that the instructor did not give and the chewing of important points. The tax law seems to be neither good nor bad. I also wanted to make a textbook so that I could understand the overall picture of the consumption tax (I am familiar with the consumption tax because I am doing accounting work, but it is difficult to understand the overall calculation structure). Business administration is good at calculations, but too much theory (memorization) is instructed to remember. I made it almost perfect, like answering each question, but there were few questions, and I was struck by a great sense of labor during this exam. The lady at the reception was super subtle like the reviews of other people. If you don't like it, when you give the answer, you will be told "You can't receive it without the cover, so please look for it" (there is no cover in the answer you actually gave), and the same thing will be said next time. It's a hassle, so when I say "This answer doesn't seem to have a cover" and hand it over, it says something like "I haven't heard that", and I was on a school course, but the reception is sluggish, so the school building I basically stopped using it. However, when I went to receive teaching materials and study consultation twice 2-3 months ago, it was a very good response (person), so I wonder if this has been improved. I've only used the web for question consultation, but it's out of the question. I have set up a support organization at a startup, but if I reply at that level, I get a complaint level content and replies like how to use Japanese three times in a row from the beginning, so I get angry when I use it, so on the way I stopped using it. I haven't used the phone so I don't know. Lastly, when it comes to the overall feeling of the school, the business feeling is amazing, for better or for worse. From the good point, the momentum and achievements are amazing. At the time of the thesis-style examination, I was in the last row, but 5 out of 6 people including myself were cpa students (determined by the teaching materials), and a reference book to see during breaks and going back and forth between the nearest station and the examination site. Most of the people who were open were cpa teaching materials. I think that you will inevitably get closer to passing the exam by being rubbed in this population and aiming for a certain grade or higher. As a bad person, I can only show good things. Well, the same is true for other companies. If you can study properly, you can take the certified accountant exam, emphasize understanding, enhance support, and so on. First of all, I think that the accountant exam can be passed if you make an effort if you have a certain academic ability or higher, but I think that it is difficult for those who do not seem to be terrible. All of the people who met at the audit corporation's briefing session after the treatise had an academic background in the former imperial university class of Soukei. Also, even if it is accepted, the person who is a listed company accountant who will be the partner in audits etc. is smart and can not compete. There is no doubt that understanding is important, but there are some subjects that appeal for understanding weakly, and it takes a lot of memorization to accept them. There is no doubt that understanding helps memorization, but you cannot escape from memorization. So, people who are not good at memorizing, after all, who are not so clever, are strict. Also, I haven't done a satisfaction survey to answer questions, and I don't know what I'm confident about. Well, I wrote a lot, but I can recommend it for people with a certain academic ability to seriously challenge the certified accountant exam, but life one-chan may be able to reverse one shot here? It is a school that feels like it is better to stop those who are about to be hung up at information sessions and affiliate sites because it is not so easy.

Instructors and teaching materials are good. However, it is a pity that the level of correspondence of the receptionist is low. Even if you call, you don't give your name (usually you should say "Yes, it's CPA Accounting Academy"), and it seems that you don't have general business etiquette such as wording, reply, and loudness. increase. Also, although it may be a trivial matter, I am worried that there is no such thing as "I'm sorry." For example, when the instructor is absent, it is better to say "I'm sorry, but the instructor is out of the seat" rather than saying "I don't have an instructor in charge right now". By the way, I feel that the reception is low level as a whole, not just one person. The reception is at the entrance of the company, so it would be better to raise the level of support. It seems to be our school, but the number of instructors is small compared to the number of students, and the reception level is low compared to other school buildings, so it is recommended to go to another school building. I wrote only the bad parts, but the level of the instructor and the completeness of the text are wonderful. It's a relative evaluation, but I think it's the best in the industry.