Tokyo Total Law Offices - Chuo City

I am indebted to this lawyer, Mr. Kurosu. Mr. Kurosu is very new, has a light footwork and is always helped. Thank you in the future.

We are currently filing a disciplinary claim against a lawyer who belongs to this office. The lawyer in question is the person who left Aoyama's office and moved here during the period of dispute mediation and disciplinary action. The request was to withdraw the dismissal by a labor referee for unfair dismissal. However, the lawyer in charge did not act as a defense at the labor trial, and the documents he had deposited were lost. In addition, he continued to make false claims for a long time that the documents had already been returned. (After confirming the location with the boss valve at that time, it turned out that it was not returned) From the above, I made a disciplinary request. Currently under investigation by the Tsuneki Committee. Before making a request, consult with multiple law firms and generally "Withdrawal of dismissal is reasonable, but resolution is a trial." While receiving the answer to that effect, only this lawyer "We can proceed with the policy of withdrawing the dismissal by the labor referee." I answered. Since the labor referee is inherently lighter than the trial in terms of the time required for resolution and the mental burden, we requested the labor referee. However, Withdrawal of unfair dismissal is often done in court, At the labor referee, another lawyer's teacher informed us that, regardless of the legitimacy of the request, the referees tend to push for a monetary settlement. At the labor referee's place When the referee saw that he would not accept the monetary settlement, he changed his attitude to a high-pressure demeanor. "Everything is not what you want" "We are not free either" For more than four hours, I was asked to agree on a settlement, accompanied by offensive language. During that time, the lawyer in charge did not stop the referee's attitude and was almost silent. In a few hours, I made only a few questions about clerical confirmation items. The referee's attitude is not fair, as he cannot receive any defense from the lawyer in charge, who should be on his side. It was a very painful and painful time. The settlement fee offered by the company was considerably higher than the market price, so at the full success fee type office to which my lawyer belonged at that time, it is better to receive the success fee from a large amount of settlement fee. It was more cost-effective than asking for the withdrawal of the dismissal. The lawyer in charge of making false declarations without hesitation, as he did not admit the loss of documents. The document admitted that it had not been returned in the dispute mediation that was made before the disciplinary request. I did not receive it because it was returned without notice, and I did not apologize for the matter. I don't know how this will eventually be dealt with by the bar association, I personally will never forget this matter and cannot forgive it. There is a lawyer who makes the client think that way. A document that the lawyer in charge admits the loss of documents, We will post a notice from the Disciplinary Committee, which has started the examination after receiving a disciplinary request. I hope that no one will have the same feelings anymore.