仙台労働基準監督署（厚生労働省 宮城労働局）

* The Labor Bureau and the Labor Standards Inspection Office are different, and their duties are also different. From the standpoint, the Labor Bureau is the headquarters and the Labor Bureau is the branch office. Please read after understanding that point. Since I retired from the company, I consulted with the Labor Bureau to claim the unpaid overtime pay, but it was a terrible response. I try to turn back without accepting the declaration whether the waterfront operation is being carried out. Even if you bring evidence documents such as a time card, attendance record, and pay slip and explain that "I want you to move because overtime is not paid and you continue to work long hours", "This is not enough" " I need this kind of evidence, so please prepare it. " If you prepare and bring the documents exactly as you were told, you will be refused to receive the documents, saying, "If you have this much evidence, you may be able to solve it by consulting with the company." When I boiled down my work and contacted the neighboring Labor Bureau, "What does it mean when the Labor Bureau does not accept the declaration?", The next day, the Labor Bureau calls me and asks me to show the documents again. How many times do you think you've shown it so far? Although I received it when I actually brought it, I was dealt with with a stance that this way of receiving is bad, saying "The labor base is urging the counselor to solve the problem by himself, and the labor base never refused the declaration." To. After that, the manager of the viewpoint was called to the Labor Bureau, interviewed and issued a correction recommendation, but overtime was not paid. The reason for the unpaid amount is that the company said, "The amount billed there is too high, and I will only pay the amount calculated by us." The amount presented is about 20% of this amount. It was reduced for the reasons such as "I embezzled transportation expenses, so I reduced it by that amount", "I took a break for one hour during overtime work", and "Sales allowance is treated as overtime pay". When I consulted with the Labor Bureau to that effect, I was replied, "I can't do any more at the Labor Bureau because I'm saying that the other side will pay even a little. After that, I have to fight in a trial." When asked, "If the company pays 100 yen, does it mean that I paid the overtime fee according to the correction recommendation?", He replied, "That's not the case, but I want you to do something on your own. There is nothing you can do anymore." Will be done. I tried to consult with the Labor Bureau again that the Labor Bureau would not work, but the statute of limitations for overtime work was approaching and I had no time, so I had to fight in a labor referee. In the end, even after consulting with the Labor Bureau, the situation was hardly resolved. (I asked a colleague who is still working, and he said that the work content has not been substantially improved due to minor measures such as forging a time card and not stamping the attendance record. No on-site inspection of the branch just when the job was called) If you think something is wrong, you should immediately consult the Labor Bureau. You shouldn't take what the Labor Bureau says. Even though he has visited more than 6 times, he works less than Xiahou Mao, let alone Zhuge Liang. I want you to improve your constitution.

It was dealt with by men, but the correspondence was very poor. A menacing way of speaking from the top. I'm consulting because I don't understand this, so I'd like you to change your attitude of listening to people a little more. I lost the energy to talk on the way.

We visited the Labor Bureau (8th floor). There was nothing like everyone wrote, and the response was quick and kind advice was given. Since both visitors and responders are human beings, there are various people, so I think there may be some disagreements. Thank you to the guards who stood at the entrance and exit of the parking lot and guided us in the rain. We also thank the female security guard who is currently required to enter the building and kindly taught us how to apply for the ID. We would also like to thank the staff members who responded at the Labor Bureau.

The old man at the labor consultation desk is the worst. I consulted with my employer and workers, but both talk only from the top. Isn't it a consultation desk? Isn't it an institution that uses taxes? What the hell is that!

It's an organization that looks at people and makes decisions. I didn't have the kindness that the previous person said, and I went to the power harassment consultation three times, but it was unpleasant. We arbitrated with the company, but it was unsuccessful, and the vulnerable people did not deal with it and did not provide relief. I was surprised that there is such an old organization at this time. Is it an ally for maintaining the black company organization of large companies and medium-sized companies? To be clear, it's a waste of tax. That's why I thought that power harassment wouldn't go away. I hope to improve my constitution.

The person who responds by telephone or at the counter is like a part-time job, not a professional person. I only listen to the story, but I urge you to dodge it and respond as much as possible. This is the so-called waterfront operation. It's the same as trying to decline an application for welfare. Therefore, if you would like us to respond, please mail the documents and declaration regarding the matter. Firmly solidified evidence and data. And be sure to attach a tax return. Otherwise, it will be treated as a consultation rather than a declaration. If you don't get a response after a week of sending those evidences, contact the Labor Department. It is a labor bureau, not a labor base. If the Labor Bureau is told that it does not respond to the declaration to the Labor Bureau, the Labor Bureau will be in trouble. The Labor Bureau will work because it is in trouble. It will not be useful unless you have this kind of enthusiasm and method. Don't think of it as a hero who will solve it if you consult.

Even though I reported about "zero breaks" when hiring people with disabilities at the government office, an elderly man who seems to be reappointed seems to be troublesome. Conclusion. It was a problem before reasonable accommodation, but I couldn't get it right. Speaking of the person in charge, first of all, I do not listen to this story. Then, he just states that he can finally do what he can do at the Labor Bureau, which will be a hit in less than a minute. Just consulting is a waste of time.

The female at the counter responded amiably, but the attitude of the staff who actually consulted, especially the elderly male staff named Hayashi, was bad. In the first place, I write down the content of the consultation on the backing paper to see if I am willing to consult. Excuse me. Even after the consultation, he just repeats "I can't do anything here yet" and there is no good advice. What did you go for? It seems that I can see through my inner desire to finish the work early, and the consultation did not deal with me for 5 minutes. Is this an organization operated by our taxes? I would like the staff member Hayashi to change his attitude or remove the person in charge of the consultation desk.