Shinkojimachi Law Offices - Chiyoda City

Mr. Toyohama is a very kind, kind and strong lawyer.

It is the best law firm ❗️ He / she really listens to the consultation from the client's point of view and responds. I am grateful.

I was kind enough to work on lawsuits several times. We have obtained satisfactory results in all lawsuits. A reliable lawyer.

I was thinking of a complete losing criminal case I was sentenced to half the sentence. And never talk about the client Listens well

I accompanied the client several times. The person in charge was sincere, and he was working on solving all the parts other than the requested case.

There are less than 30 lawyers. The inside of the office is not flashy and conveys a solid feeling. The other attorney was easy to talk to and sincere

The personal address of gmail was used for communication with the lawyer of this office. I hear that it is common for companies that handle personal information to ban the use of free e-mail in business because of the high risk of leakage. I would like to know what it is like in the light of the guidelines and practices of this industry, including reputational risk.

The receptionist was very soft and considerate of the counselor, but I was disappointed with the management policy of our office. This is my impression, but first of all, I don't think it makes sense to have a free telephone consultation with our office, or even the consultation itself. At the time of reception, I told them the matter and asked a lawyer who was familiar with it to hand it over, but he said that the lawyer who handles the service is limited to those who handle general problems. Furthermore, even though the lawyer took over the phone and explained the matter, he answered that it was out of the jurisdiction and that he could not answer accurately unless he checked everything. (As an impression of the response, I could not feel the reliability and security as if I was having trouble responding from beginning to end.) In the end, I concluded that it would be better to visit the office once and talk in detail, but when I visited the office for the first time, I confirmed that I would be in charge of a lawyer who is familiar with the appointment and requirements of a lawyer. It was said that the lawyer who is currently responding by telephone will continue to be in charge of the same matter. I was stunned. If the consultation is continued, it will take time to understand the requirements of each consultant, and it is natural to pay for it, but why is it necessary to familiarize yourself with the law outside the jurisdiction of the lawyer in charge? Do I have to pay for the time? Even if it was a small-scale consultation for the general public, I was deeply concerned, and I was very disappointed because I had high expectations for the evaluation of this office. It doesn't hurt to think that I have to be at a loss again.