河内長野市公園緑化協会

Regarding the work of the Park Association ~ _ Looking at the park in the northern part of Kawachinagano City Around this time, I've been wondering if it's the Park Association's main job to personally scramble for prohibited signboards. - As for the toilets, if you compare the toilets managed by the prefectural park with the toilets in the municipal park, it's a glance. How much could I have bought the undiluted solution of Shabot for installing a park toilet if I reduced the number of signs that disturbed the landscape? - Why did the park in Nankadai in particular decline? Perhaps even business people see it as not worth using, and one of the reasons is that no one uses it. - I personally think that the cost of occupancy can be expected if it is free of charge and the permit is simplified only for specific industries that lead to the increase of the city's population and the development of the region. For example, in the case of vending machines, the atmosphere of Nakamura Pond and Teragaike Park seems to be profitable, but are other parks profitable? Is it a big deficit just for the loss? The number of people who come to the park as their destination will decrease due to the fact that vending machines cannot be installed in nearby parks because they are not profitable. It's even harder to sell food trucks, and no one chooses. Rather, it is also necessary to invest money and bow to the food truck. ―――― It seems that the high amount of occupancy permit and the installation of a large number of signboards that disturb the situation and landscape are ultimately linked to the decline of the attractiveness of each citizen and the decline of Kawachinagano City.