障害者向け就労移行支援フロンティアリンク 岡山キャリアセンター

Far from the station Close to Hello Work

I couldn't use it due to the system, but I would like to use it if I have the opportunity.

When I visited you last year, he helped me carry my luggage and talked to me kindly. I learned from the blog that he got a job. I am sure that you will be active in your new workplace. Please do your best

Employee Y is quite sloppy as a mental employee. Specifically, the following measures were taken during the outpatient service. ・ When I was talking about difficult things, I was told something that would be suppressed by general theory. Without knowing my various circumstances and how much I'm suffering. It should be the basis of the response to accept the other party's words first and not to cover the general theory from the beginning in order to be careful. What's more, at that time, even if I bothered to say, "In general, even if that is the case, this is what I personally do," he says, "Because the world is like this now," and does not accept the other party. This is a response that makes us feel that we are not trying to deny and accept the suffering of users. ・ Soon after I started a certain work with her, I wasn't very good mentally, so I decided to cancel it depending on the content of the work in the future, and when I tried to listen to the content at the right timing, "Ah! As soon as I didn't say anything extra, I was forcibly interrupted in the middle of the story and distracted. Do not respect the other person. In fact, it was a kind of work that I was familiar with, and I didn't have to force myself to do it. ・ Sometimes I was told as if I was telling elementary and junior high school students, such as "Relative evaluation! You know difficult words." For adults who are older than the director, let alone she. If the director comes as a troublesome user, will he do the same? I may have been seen as younger than 20 years old, so it might have seemed quite younger, but if so, what about this response? The user is a person who has the appropriate knowledge as if he / she is coming to learn IT skills. In an article previously posted on a news site, a person who attended a facility for the mentally ill is a simple task that is unlikely to be praised by a general adult at that facility. When I did, there was a story saying that the staff praised me and quit attending, saying "I did it well!", But I felt that the response was exactly the same. ・ When I said something different from what she said about something related to me, I wasn't accepting it, but rather defensively. Self-defense words such as "Because it's OO!" Come first. He doesn't take the other person's words firmly, and he doesn't have the attitude of listening to those words. ・ Suddenly after the morning greeting, I unilaterally said, "I should take a rest on a rainy day!" He often gave advice with arbitrary judgment and affirmative ending without understanding the circumstances and suffering of people. Far from being useful at all, I was told in an open place about the contents related to the circumstances that I do not want to be touched, and the fact that there are people and talking there is nervous ( I had already told the staff about it in advance), and I had a hard time reacting. Although there may be some unavoidable parts to give advice because there may have been a sense of responsibility and kindness in the job of life guidance, it is difficult for the user to have a repulsive feeling because of the detailed circumstances and pain of the person. Instead, he is selfish and has a strong tone that makes him feel uncomfortable with his eyes and pressure from above. You should devise a way to bring the ending and the story, such as "How about doing OO?". I don't understand that such a response can psychologically put pressure on or drive people, and that it is basically an NG response, or more specifically, a counseling mindset. This is a typical example of how amateurs often do it. In other words, instead of responding from the top, such as "I don't know this person, I should teach you, I should teach you." Instead of judging that this person is such a person, such a situation, I wonder if he is thinking like this, he listens carefully in a close-knit manner, and if he has any advice, he does not know yet or does not want to say it. Considering the circumstances and the fact that there may be some pain, I felt that I did not have the basic stance of making proposals while confirming the intention of the person so that the imposition would not be overwhelming. I decided that it would be better to inform the staff S about the matters to be communicated during the break due to circumstances, but I was interrupted without listening to the story in a difficult way. Other staff members often receive user information during breaks, so I tried to say the same thing. As a result, I couldn't communicate, which hindered my subsequent learning for a certain period of time. In addition, there were several times when I was taken a high-pressure attitude without knowing the circumstances. In addition, Director T took the following actions. ・ At first, I said that I couldn't make a contract without a guarantor, but after that, I found out that it wasn't the case if there was no guarantor, and I pointed out that it was different. There was no word of apology to him, "I was told by the head office that I needed a guarantor ... but the contract says so, so I'll just send it to the head office." I felt distrust because there was a similar response in the procedure. ・ When deciding on my seat, she said in a strong tone that she was a user of a certain seat, saying, "That person is so noisy!" How do you say that in front of other users? If there is something, the user may be told that way. From the words that appear at the end of other conversations, I felt that the mental staff had a strong tendency to be critical and poisonous, and that they were not very receptive to people. ・ Above all, I would like to point out that there is a lack of receptive attitude when listening to the story, and there are often endless words such as aizuchi, reaction, and confirmation on the top of the Buddha. While I was mentally very tough, I often had to do my best to talk about personal content that I didn't want to talk to others, but the unresponsiveness on the top of the Buddha seems to have been skipped. I was worried that the point I wanted to say was being conveyed properly, and the story became long, and I felt that my circumstances and suffering were treated coldly and lightly, so I responded very often. There may be an intention of being neutral, cautious, and considerate of the other party, but even if you do not agree with all the content of the story, proper aizuchi and confirmation should be the basis of consultation work. If you can't confirm it properly, it means that you can't hear it properly. In fact, at the end, there was a scene where I could clearly understand if I didn't listen to people's stories. Specifically, I told him that he didn't always take a rest even on a rainy day, along with personal circumstances that he didn't want to say, but at one point he was stunned when he said, "It's always a holiday on a rainy day." As a whole, I felt stressed because I didn't feel comfortable with the response, including the lack of words such as aizuchi and confirmation. At first, each staff member was able to respond as described above, but as they continued to accumulate, they struggled with depression, suicidal ideation, and extreme tension in going where there were people, and became heavy. Although I was dragging, I was very stressed, and at some point my emotions exploded, my symptoms worsened, and I was forced to leave the office. Since the environment at home wasn't in place, I decided to go to the office instead of attending at home, but I think that if I stayed at home, the number of contacts with the staff would be greatly reduced, so there would have been no damage so far. However, in any case, the above is basically only content that is considered to be NG in mental and psychological response training. If you are a mental employee, you should at least keep these basics in mind. I would like you to have a thorough training for specialist supervision before you go to the site. A long time ago, my friend also went to another welfare facility, and the fact that the negotiations there were not so good helped me to commit suicide. There is a possibility of this depending on the response, so the staff should be very careful. The content of the lecture video of IT skills, which is the main service of this facility, is also good, and the humanity of the staff itself is basically not bad people, so there should be many places where you can look at the entire facility. However, due to the above-mentioned measures, the symptoms of mental illness worsened and he was discharged from the hospital, so the evaluation is the lowest. Because it is a facility for the mentally handicapped and it is proclaiming consideration. I myself have worked as a staff member for a year and a half at a facility for the mentally ill, and for many years after changing jobs, many persons with mental and intellectual disabilities (attempted suicide, admission to a psychiatric hospital closed ward, etc.) and their families Therefore, I have experience of receiving consultations in private and providing long-term support in a form similar to psychological counseling. When I was consulted in private, I heard a lot of sensitive real stories that I probably wouldn't tell others (even family / friends, medical / welfare personnel). And now that I am also a person with a disability, I have to go to this facility, but in the end I will leave the facility in a short period of time, and after that my mental state that has fallen to the bottom has stabilized to some extent again, and I look back on that time. It took me a long time to be able to do it, and even now, even after a long time since I left the office, I am sometimes dreamed about the above measures, and I am surprised at my first experience. For many years, I have had many contacts with people who have mental and psychological relationships, and I have had many opportunities to continue to receive welfare services, but like this time, I became uncomfortable and my symptoms worsened, and the effects continued for a long time. I had never had enough experience to do it. From my own actual experience and what I heard when I was consulted in private, I am familiar with how careless words and actions around me can drive the parties into a dangerous situation. It motivated me to write the content in such detail. The staff are also human beings in a very stressful environment, so I understand that they are not perfect, and they are compatible with each other. In addition, there may be an opinion that it is a place for employment support, so it is not too easy to be a mentally handicapped person, but I wrote a frank opinion considering the younger generation.