（株）アステックペイント 大阪営業所

The staff are also kind and polite!

I chose silicon for ultra-bottom pollution refinement and had the outer wall repainted. In conclusion, within half a year after repainting, it became a small bumpy and rough surface like the one in the photo. I regret choosing refinement. Astec (Osaka Deputy Director) correspondence is also not good. This time, I was in such a state, and I asked the construction company and Astec to confirm, but it is said that there is no problem in terms of functionality and product. According to Astec, the construction method and technically of the construction company is higher than the general market price, and there is no problem with the product. It is natural that refinement will be like this depending on the conditions. However, the answer was that there was no clear cause and that it was due to various factors such as the condition of the original painted surface and the environment of the house. The condition of the house before painting is that the sea and mountains in Osaka prefecture are not nearby, the siding wall is less than 10 years old, the wall in the photo is a north facing wall, and the ventilation is usually good. I asked several companies to conduct a field survey based on a phase estimate, but all the companies are in good condition and the painting work is still early. It was such a situation. If this happens under these conditions, there is a good chance that refinement will happen on the walls of any house. Also, I think that those who choose refinement will choose performance and aesthetics as it is, but please be careful as a microwall revolution will occur, which is far from the beauty wall revolution of the product name. Also, at the construction stage (after applying the undercoat twice and the topcoat twice), the undercoat was seen through in spots as a whole, and I thought that the construction method was bad, so I had Astec come to see it. However, at that time, I was told that the construction method was perfect and there were no problems with the product. Then, isn't it a problem for Astec to be transparent in dots? He says it's a problem. I don't understand the meaning. It wasn't painted under special siding or environment, and there is no problem with the product and construction method, so why is it a problem after completion? However, there is no problem in terms of product and functionality. It was a single point. At that time, I managed to solve it by asking the construction company to apply another topcoat. As with the previous and this case, Astec does not seem to care about the appearance of the wall after painting, despite the fact that it is said to be a beautiful wall revolution. I only say it's okay because there is no problem in terms of functionality. It is normal for the finished surface to be dirty. It is such a product. I do not admit that the manufacturer is not. It's such a company. Refine is not recommended if you are particular about the appearance and quality of the repainting. It's not a cheap purchase, and it will be in that state for about 10 years after repainting, so if you are interested, think carefully and do not regret it. By the way, the neighboring house that was constructed using Nippon Paint at the same construction company at the same time is beautiful. Make it look as beautiful as possible. I was stupid because I chose Astec, which is higher than Nippon Paint, because it has functionality and I wanted it to last a long time.