サンエス警備保障株式会社 柏支社 - Kashiwa

It ’s just a clever person.

There is no parking lot. Confusing.

I think it's a very good company for me. Thank you very much for your support. Thank you very much.

When I asked the interview to do a part-time job here, I was asked to come again at the scheduled date and time without a person in charge. (It was written that transportation expenses were paid at the time of interview, but it was not paid) When I visited the interview again, I gave my CV first, but I couldn't share it within the company, so it took a lot of time.

In Townwork, it was 12000 yen for 12 hours of daily work, but when I actually opened the lid, it was 11000 yen for 11 hours, and 18000 yen for work from 7:00 to 19:30 for 2 hours. Restraint time increases to 15,000, and you can do whatever you want later! I don't know the life of the members, only thinking about how much labor costs can be reduced.

It is the place where the finished humans go as the last bastion, which is not trusted both humanly and socially. I'm glad I declined when I was interviewed. It's better to look for something else than to waste time in a company like this. You don't have to go to such a snowdrift yourself.

[Concealment / Insufficient employee education] Although it happened several years ago, I will describe it because it is well known that the circumstances such as the reason for retirement are very different from the facts. (Mid 2015-early 2016) This company was a workplace where many people did not even have the basic manners as a member of society. Respect, politeness, modest use of words, reports, contacts, consultations, etc. Judgment is based on one's own beliefs and personal preferences without confirming what the client wants. The major premise that "who is evaluated and who is profiting" There is no medium- to long-term vision for future contracts. From beginning to end, it's all about ad hoc and short-circuit words and deeds. Despite the principle of "9-hour restraint and 8-hour work", excessive breaks are required. Etc. In particular, the site I was in charge of was not limited to normal security work, There are many irregular contents including data management, PC input, light work, etc. Also, commuting was a very inconvenient place, so The burden was enormous. The sales person who is the contractor throws the whole thing in a neglected state. The director N, who is on the management side, has not taken over the company at all, and he has no intention of doing so. As an example, It is a non-contact accident between a construction vehicle and a general bicycle. (Mr. F) (As a result of detecting danger and taking evasive action, he suffered damage by falling or colliding with another obstacle.) I was paid by the car insurance of the driving vehicle company, Over the course of several days, I made many round trips between the site in charge and the headquarters. I was alone in confirming the facts and responding to affiliated companies. There is no overtime or travel expenses. The member who was guiding was not a contact accident, so I just ran around with excuses that I wasn't faulty. If the company does not understand the site, it will take a stance of avoiding responsibility. Did not try to get involved. Every day I am chased by the above troubles and irresponsible responses I couldn't afford to list such cases. From them, my physical and mental health was destroyed, and I couldn't go to work. I will go to the hospital. At that time, I applied for an injury and illness allowance for work-related accidents, The company didn't keep up. Director N just laughs and confirms the head office appropriately, "It looks like it's impossible." In the midst of exhaustion, a lawyer, a judicial scrivener, a labor standards inspection office, I contacted Shinmatsudo and Makuhari Pension Office, and after a few months, the procedure was finally possible. ⇒ I fell down in early 2015 ⇒ It was about the same time that the application for work-related accidents was rejected by the company. ⇒In early 2016, the Makuhari Pension Office provided administrative guidance to the company and received a notification that the procedure was possible. The company's response was terrible, and it was not because I filed a complaint in the end, but an internal agreement with a false explanation that it "responded voluntarily." Initially, there was no care even when the person collapsed, and even if the procedure was rejected, each person in charge passed on the responsibility and continued to circulate. The person in charge of the branch office (Director N) also has a single point that "the person above is saying (I am not responsible)". * No awareness as the person in charge of one branch office There was a word of apology on the phone, but He didn't understand what caused the problem and how it happened, and he didn't seem to intend to do it. At first, he said, "Is it okay to do it in Dogeza?" When I explained the facts from the beginning and strongly asked, "Would you like to come to sit down?" Sugosugo and "No, that's ... I'm sorry. I don't remember ..." And apologize only for irresponsible words from beginning to end. On the other hand, at that time, my health condition was not fully recovered and I was busy with moving and changing jobs, so I was convinced by the ambiguous solution. In retrospect, I regret that I should have taken legal action. A company that anyone can enter is of the same quality. Those who are seriously engaged (except for some) will leave the company, and those who are irresponsible, negligent and lack common sense will remain. The biggest problem is the lack of awareness of them. The more vicious the perpetrator, the stronger the victim consciousness. If you have any doubts about the company's response, we recommend early retirement and early response (legal measures, etc.).